The oppression of Afghans by the United States

 The oppression of Afghans by the United States Injustice in American Justice

 The mistakes and errors of the superpowers are also great, they can ride on the horse of arrogance, start with one small mistake and end up with these small mistakes one after the other and cause the collapse of a great superpower.

 World War I started with the mistake of killing one person and then burned the most civilized countries and nations of Europe. World War II started with Hitler's selfish instinct and ended with the loss of fifty million lives  The former Soviet Union also made its mistake due to the arrogance of a dictator and the false influence and false promises of a rich man, but in the end this mistake led to the collapse of the Soviet Union.  America made the same mistake again with some differences.  Although not yet destroyed, the shame of its defeat is no less than that of the Soviet Union and Old Britain.

 The US has been in a hurry to invade Afghanistan, bringing in thieves and cronies at home and bringing them to power instead of the Taliban. This heterogeneous and artificial combination and their  Frequent mistakes in the course of twenty-one years of rule, they faced an undesirable fate that did not occur to the thought of such a world-class superpower.

 The United States of America is one of the largest countries in the world with an area of ​​1.2 million square kilometers and a population of 1.2 million, consuming about 5% of the world's energy and about 9% of the world's gold.  It is said to be in control of almost 7% of the world's economy, with an annual monetary (GDP) of نیم 21.5 trillion.  Afghanistan's annual remittance from 2012-13 was only شل 20 billion, and given the current situation, our country's total annual remittance may have dropped to لس 10 billion.  That is, their payout period in the United States is nearly (2,000 times) longer than in Afghanistan.

 This size of the economy and this advancement of technology does not mean that they will be superior to the Afghans in the social sphere and in the provision of justice. Rather, the right is in the hands of the Afghans.

 When T. Bano regained control of Afghanistan last August, the US government froze all of Afghanistan's assets (approximately نیم 8.5 billion).  Shortly after leaving Afghanistan, rumors were circulating that a US court had ruled that part of the money would go to the families of the nearly 4,000 victims of the 9/11 attacks.  If this decision is implemented, the burden of economic oppression on Afghans will be lifted and the US government will continue to commit other humanitarian and economic crimes against the oppressed Afghan people in the wake of past political and war crimes and mistakes in Afghanistan.  Here we want the views and decisions of the US government and then the courts

 Let us have a few remarks about the responsibility and obligation of the parties concerned:

 The basis of the decision depends on the content that (Osama bin Laden) and his associates attacked the United States.  The previous government gave them asylum and used this place against the United States, so they are hot and have to pay the price. It has to be said:

 2. Osama bin Laden and the Arab fighters themselves were born of the great policies of the United States, they fought against the Russian forces and during the war between the two, the Afghan people suffered heavy losses.

 2. Osama bin Laden and his associates were brought to Afghanistan by jihadist groups who later used them as American domestic militias and wielded power and blessings during the American military presence.  , America instead of t.  The Albanians, whom Osama bin Laden inherited from past jihadist groups, should have been held accountable in due course for their actions.

 ۳- ط.  ا.  When Lebanon first came to power, there were only fifty and one hundred notes left in the treasury of Da Afghanistan Bank, which at the time were devalued due to high inflation, nothing more, a Russian company Rabbani-Massoud and a British  The company printed money back to General Dostum, which devalued the afghani (one and a half thousand times).

 At the time of his rule, the annual budget of the whole country was about (fifty one million dollars) which he had no chance to save. With the exception of three countries, neither the government nor the government recognized it.

 3. If the Americans had raised the issue of compensation, they would have done so during the previous regime, at least, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, which recognized the rule of the Taliban.  Recognized, the Americans were regional allies and Osama bin Laden himself had all sorts of connections with them, telling them to look we demanded our compensation from these people.

 2. The matter has not been referred to any international court other than a US court and no one has commented on it.  Neither the plaintiff nor the prosecutor has filed a lawsuit.  There is only one government, there is a court, there is no plaintiff, there is no defendant, there is no case and no character.

 2. As we have said before, the total annual budget of the country under the government was about (3) million dollars.  , So what was the need for his backing?  This (eight and a half billion dollars) is backed by the collective efforts of the Afghan people in the 20 years since the fall of their regime, including the total value of gold and other valuable currencies.  So this resource belongs to the people, I have no hand in its construction, so now I will  ا.  In expiation for the deeds of the Lebanese people, the people are losing this treasure.

 5. The strange thing is that no country in the world recognizes the government.  They do not call it the representative of the Afghan people, but the owner and owner of the nation's money.  He does not consider it to represent the will of the people, so why do you hold him responsible for such a huge treasury?

 2. Calling itself an American and other international terrorist group and some of them still consider it a terrorist group.  Is there any provision in the US Court of Justice that allows terrorists to deposit their money in US banks, to make a profit on them, even within 20 years, of such a country and  For the geographers who have been recognized by a hundred countries and the United Nations, they have printed money for them, but not their own government, they are a group, twenty years later a court has ruled that no money  I dismiss them for the crimes committed during the previous government.  While the court cannot prove when the money is due?

 ۹-که ط.  He is so powerful that during his five years in power he has built up a reserve of (8.5 billion in the central bank on his own.  The government has not been able to save a single dollar and in four or five years it has made such an economic loss, so maybe the people will say that we need such a useful government !?

 2. Afghanistan was invaded under the pretext of Osama's presence, Afghan villages and homes were bombed, but a few years later Osama was born in Abbottabad, Pakistan.  "Sometimes even the most ordinary things are very important, but at work people forget about it. When the American soldiers were operating on Osama bin Laden, they knew his height, so much so that he was one of them," he wrote.  The soldiers also found him and said that when Osama was killed, you would go with him to find out if he really is Osama.

  Barack Obama added: "The soldiers did not think that they should carry a meter instead of a man, they should measure the height of him.  Was equal, extended to Osama and his faith matured)).

 Even the big powers have such thoughts, now they have arrested the Afghan people under the guise of 'T', why did you give shelter to Osama, but they did not tell them anything from the original place of refuge.  If there really was justice in the US judiciary, then the Pakistani government should have bought into the case, frozen all its assets, and if it did not have the money, it would have taken the atomic bomb as collateral.  Strange logic is that Osama came out of Pakistan, but used his mother bomb on Afghanistan!

 2. Who was this Osama?  Whose son was he? Whose son was he?  Did he have ancestry or was he born and raised here in Afghanistan?

 It is well-known that the Laden family is one of the five or six prominent families in Saudi Arabia.  Living in luxury in England, France and other Western countries at the expense of his father, a US court has not ruled on a compensation for his assets, but has expressed grief.  The burden fell on the shoulders of the Afghan people.

 2- Osama bin Laden was a citizen of Saudi Arabia and some of his family members were also present there. His capital is also stored there.  So why not reach out to the real caregivers and educators who are holding the tears of an oppressed nation in their tears? The Saudis now have more than (400 billion in US banks.  Much must be done and given to the Afghan people because they have been the victims of their great and unjust games and their geography has been misused as a battlefield.

 2. The new officials here in Kabul are of the opinion that if this (ten billion dollars) is released, they will pay the salaries of their employees, spend it on the military and cover their budget deficit.  That is why he is making hot propaganda, hiding his lack of a systematic economic plan under the pretext that he is the one who stopped the flow of money to Afghanistan, otherwise everything would have been fine ?!

 The fact is that a large portion of this money is backed by Afghan banknotes. If this money were to go out of its way and be used elsewhere, Afghan banknotes would be blown away and inflation would rise sharply.  A number of circles in Dr. Ghani's government have also tried to use the money for military and political purposes, but they have not been able to gain much access to it.  Take advantage of this constant backing for other purposes.

 There is only a small amount of money that earns Afghanistan three hundred and four hundred million dollars a year through their circulation, which can be spent either on backing the afghani or on health and education.  In addition, there is a large amount of money set aside by the international community for development projects in Afghanistan, which must be released.  Is a collection of public assets of the people, which preserves and guarantees the value of nearly three hundred billion Afghanis that are currently marketable, Da Afghanistan Bank has written on each banknote that:  Promises the certificate holder to pay ... AFN at the time of application).  When Da Afghanistan Bank does not have this reserve of gold and foreign currency then by what evidence?  This type of banknote, which has no backing, is just a piece of paper.  Another thing is that it means that we love the money collected during the previous government, but we hate men !?  The fact is that this money is not the private property of the previous government, nor of the present nor of Sabani, it is the property of the nation and must be kept safe for the nation.

 2. The hope of the Afghan people is that the United States of America, their special court and the World Bank will first determine the exact amount of all the assets of Afghanistan that have been frozen or secured so far.  The second is to determine the amount that the afghani is used as a backing and should be kept safe and not to be used elsewhere.  The year has seen some gains and a fourth of the international aid that has now been frozen.

 2. Officials of the new government can discuss with the United States and the international community only the benefits of the circulation of surplus money, as well as the redemption of international aid, without the backing of money.  It has no right to interfere, even with governments that face even greater obstacles to its legitimacy and sustainability.  That only revolves around the money collected in the past.

 2. The executive, the legislature, and the judiciary in the United States are said to be a triangle of equilateral triangles. The US courts should not be subjected to such political pressure from the executive branch as to avenge the political defeat of the US government.  Take it from ordinary Afghans under the pretext that it should be clear to them that you are saying that I am.  Alban cannot represent the Afghan people politically, so why should the Afghan nation be entrusted with the power to capitalize on the sufferings of a lifetime?  If the court.  In retaliation, the government will bring to justice why it signed a peace agreement in Doha with a group that has a pre-trial case with a US court and has been found guilty of killing Americans.  This is not to say that the cost of the office in Qatar is paid directly by the US government and indirectly by its interest partner (Qatar).  So whoever bears the cost of someone's political office should also bear the responsibility for the compensation for their past and future political actions.  The Afghan people should be able to cover this cost from the national treasury!  Is this a fair and logical debate?

 2- The Afghan people hope and demand from the American government, the people, especially the courts, not to make cruel and childish decisions, not to repeat the mistakes of the past, to be a great and civilized nation of the world and to uphold justice.  Recognize your responsibility as an effective resource, if you do not consider yourself morally and legally responsible for paying war compensation to the Afghan people, then the burden of incompetence of your government and politicians should also fall on you.  The oppressed Afghan people are not burdened, the incident that took place in the United States on September 9 was the result of the incompetence of the security and political sector of that country, no Afghan was involved in it.  Now that you are asking the Afghan people to compensate for this loss, it seems that a very powerful and powerful investor, whose capital is more than two thousand times more than an oppressed Malang, should tell him that a few years ago I trained one.  The friend sent to your village to crush his enemy, well I swelled and praised, but when my rival was defeated in your village, my friend rebelled against me, he shouted at me from your village, then I  Then I came here and bombed the village and the people. The man was not found. After some time, we took another friend of ours out of the village and killed him there.  She has won by force and has kept her children in her arms.  Because my enemy had been hiding in your village for many days !?  The judgment of the American court is a similar judgment!